Category Archives: CRJ 514

ASH CRJ 514 Week 1 DQ 2 Resource Reading – How to Read a Case and Research Article – Wrongful Conviction Updated

To purchase this material click

http://www.homeworkrank.com/crj-514-ash/crj-514-week-1-dq-2-resource-reading-how-to-read-a-case-and-research-article-wrongful-conviction-updated

Resource Reading – How to Read a Case and Research Article

Carefully examine “How to Read a Research Article” from Section II of your text (Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 42-45). Using the 10 criteria for review found in the text, prepare a critical analysis of one of the four articles which immediately follow the analyses techniques:
“The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court” (Feeley, 1971, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 46-55);
“The Honest Politician’s Guide to Juvenile Justice in the Twenty-First Century” (Feld, 1994, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 55-67);
“The Rehnquist Court and Criminal Justice: An Empirical Assessment” (Smith, 2003, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 67-83); or
“Wrongful Conviction: Perceptions of Criminal Justice Professionals Regarding the Frequency of Wrongful Conviction and the Extent of System Errors” (Ramsey & Frank, 2007, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 83-107).

For more classes visit
www.homeworkrank.com

ASH CRJ 514 Week 2 Assignment U.S. Supreme Court Bill of Rights Case Miranda v. Arizona Updated

Leave a reply

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.homeworkrank.com/crj-514-ash/crj-514-week-2-assignment-us-supreme-court-bill-of-rights-case-miranda-v-arizona-updated

U.S. Supreme Court Bill of Rights Case.

For this assignment, you will analyze one U.S. Supreme Court criminal case decision dealing with a Bill of Rights issue. You must include the facts of the case (i.e., what happened), the holding of the court (i.e., what the court decided), and the reasoning for that decision. Additionally, explain how the constitutional right is practically applied to protect the individual and/or society as a whole. Provide your personal opinion on the relative strength and/or weakness of this constitutional issue moving forward in the 21st century. Select one of the following five options:
Gideon v. Wainwright
In re Gault
Mapp v. Ohio
Miranda v. Arizona
Terry v. Ohio
You may examine a different case, but you must obtain instructor approval by Day 3 (Thursday) of Week Two.
Your paper must
Be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Include a separate title page with the following:
o Titleofpaper
o Student’sname
o Course name and number o Instructor’sname
o Datesubmitted
Use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
Document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Share Share on Facebook Tweet Tweet on Twitter Pin it Pin on Pinterest

For more classes visit
www.homeworkrank.com

ASH CRJ 514 Week 2 DQ 1 Plea Bargaining Updated

Leave a reply

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.homeworkrank.com/crj-514-ash/crj-514-week-2-dq-1-plea-bargaining-updated

As you learned in your readings this week, a vast majority of criminal cases are resolved through plea bargaining. Evaluate when plea bargaining can occur, the ethics of plea bargaining, and how plea bargaining affects the criminal justice process. Speculate on what would happen to the criminal justice system without plea bargaining, and propose alternatives to the plea bargaining process to enhance justice and efficiency to the criminal justice process. It is recommended that your post contain approximately 400 words.

For more classes visit
www.homeworkrank.com

ASH CRJ 514 Week 3 Assignment Final Paper Outline – Capital Punishment Updated

Leave a reply

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.homeworkrank.com/crj-514-ash/crj-514-week-3-assignment-final-paper-outline-capital-punishment-updated

For this assignment, you will construct a comprehensive outline for the Final Paper, which is due at the end of Week Six. For assistance with creating and formatting your outline, please access the sample outline handout from the Ashford Writing Center.
Your outline must
Be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including the title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Detail your chosen issue to be addressed in your Final Paper.
Provide a brief history of the U.S. Supreme Court’s philosophy of your chosen issue.
Detail your preliminary conclusion about the future of this issue in light of the current makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Include a separate title page with the following:
o Titleofpaper
o Student’sname
o Course name and number o Instructor’sname
o Datesubmitted
Use at least four scholarly sources in addition to the course text, two of which must be from the Ashford University Library.
Document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

For more classes visit
www.homeworkrank.com

ASH CRJ 514 Week 3 DQ 1 Analyze One U.S. Supreme Court Justice Updated

Leave a reply

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.homeworkrank.com/crj-514-ash/crj-514-week-3-dq-1-analyze-one-us-supreme-court-justice-updated
Choose one, current Supreme Court justice, and provide a biography of significant events in the justice’s life, the political labels placed on the justice, an examination of whether or not that political label is accurate, and an analysis of the judge’s philosophy on constitutional issues. It is recommended that your post contain approximately 400 words

For more classes visit
www.homeworkrank.com

ASH CRJ 514 Week 3 DQ 2 Constitutional Rights of Defendants Updated

Leave a reply

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.homeworkrank.com/crj-514-ash/crj-514-week-3-dq-2-constitutional-rights-of-defendants-updated

The U.S. Constitution provides multiple rights for someone accused of a crime—the defendant in a criminal case filed by a prosecutor. Choose one right for the accused, and explain why this is the most significant safeguard for criminal defendants. Discuss at least two U.S. Supreme Court opinions which interpreted this right. Did the Supreme Court limit or expand upon the plain language from the U.S. Constitution? In what way? Discuss the relevance of the right in modern society. It is recommended that your post contain approximately 400 words.

For more classes visit
www.homeworkrank.com

ASH CRJ 514 Week 4 Assignment Criminal Process Arraignment to Pre-Trial Updated

Leave a reply

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.homeworkrank.com/crj-514-ash/crj-514-week-4-assignment-criminal-process-arraignment-to-pre-trial-updated

For this assignment, you will examine constitutional protections for defendants prior to trial by providing a detailed analysis of the criminal justice process from arraignment to the setting of a trial for a defendant. At a minimum, your paper must detail how a criminal charge is filed, the pre-trial process, the parties and players of the criminal justice process, and the defendant’s rights through pre-trial proceedings.

Your paper must
Be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including the title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Include a separate title page with the following:
o Titleofpaper
o Student’sname
o Course name and number o Instructor’s name
o Datesubmitted

Use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
Document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

For more classes visit
www.homeworkrank.com

ASH CRJ 514 Week 4 DQ 1 Modern Composition of U.S. Supreme Court Updated

Leave a reply

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.homeworkrank.com/crj-514-ash/crj-514-week-4-dq-1-modern-composition-of-us-supreme-court-updated

Explore the ideological tendencies of the majority and minority of the current U.S. Supreme Court. What is meant by liberal or conservative judges? Considering the process for selecting Supreme Court justices, is it possible for politics to not play a role in the process? Explain how these ideological/political tendencies shape U.S. Supreme Court opinions. It is recommended that your post contain approximately 400 words.

Guided Response:

The vast majority of legal scholars who review Supreme Court cases agree on the political leanings of varying U.S. Supreme Court eras. Explain the consensus of the current Supreme Court, and evaluate how that political leaning will shape pending U.S. Supreme Court issues. Review your colleagues posts, and substantively respond to at least two of your peers. Continue to monitor the discussion forum until 5:00 p.m. (Mountain Time) on Day 7 of the week, and respond with robust dialogue to anyone who replies to your initial post.

For more classes visit
www.homeworkrank.com

ASH CRJ 514 Week 4 DQ 2 Evaluate a Modern U.S. Supreme Court Criminal Case, 2005 or Later Updated

Leave a reply

To Buy This material Click below link

http://www.homeworkrank.com/crj-514-ash/crj-514-week-4-dq-2-evaluate-a-modern-us-supreme-court-criminal-case-2005-or-later-updated

Analyze a criminal case opinion issued by the U.S. Supreme Court, 2005 or later; explain the issue(s) in the case, the holding of the case, its basis, the number of justices for and against the opinion, and whether it set precedent (i.e., new law) or merely reaffirmed long-standing constitutional values. Identify the justice who authored the opinion, and provide that justice’s ideology. You may choose any case listed below, or locate a criminal U.S. Supreme Court case, 2005 or later, to analyze. It is recommended that your post contain approximately 400 words.
Clark v. Arizona (2006) [Insanity Defense]
Davis v. United States (2011) [Illegal Search Admissible]
Davis v. Washington (2006) [911 Call Admissible at trial?]
Florida v. Powell (2009) [Miranda Warnings]
Giles v. California (2008) [Dead victim’s statements not admissible at trial?]
Graham v. Florida (2010) [Life Sentence for Juvenile Violate Eighth Amendment?]
Greenlaw v. United States (2008) [Can court enhance sentence without prosecutor request?]
Herring v. United States (2009) [Erroneous Search Warrant Require Suppression of Evidence?]
Holmes v. South Carolina (2006) [Exclude Defense Evidence?]
Hudson v. Michigan (2006) [Fourth Amendment “Knock and Announce” Rule]
J.D.B. v. North Carolina (2011) [Age Matter for Miranda Warnings?]
Kennedy v. Louisana (2007) [Death penalty for child rape?]

For more classes visit
www.homeworkrank.com

ASH CRJ 514 Week 5 Assignment Criminal Process Post-Trial Updated

Leave a reply

To Buy This material Click below link
http://www.homeworkrank.com/crj-514-ash/crj-514-week-5-assignment-criminal-process-post-trial-updated
For this assignment, prepare a three to five page paper (excluding the APA title and references pages) in which you detail the process after a criminal trial. In your paper, explain what happens with the defendant and the case after an acquittal. Detail the sentencing process after conviction, and evaluate the defendant’s right of allocution. Discuss victims’ rights at sentencing. Explain when an appeal is available for either the defense or prosecution, and provide a “road map” for a court to reach the U.S. Supreme Court from a trial court.
Your paper must
Be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including the title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Include a separate title page with the following:
o Titleofpaper
o Student’sname
o Course name and number o Instructor’sname
o Datesubmitted
Use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
Document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

For more classes visit
www.homeworkrank.com